Voting at 16? How about a maximum voting age?

With local government election turnout numbers reaching the deepest depths, how do we encourage participation?

What's stopping younger people getting out there, airing their views and being heard? Might it be that they don't see themselves at the table?

Well how about this..

The idea of instituting a maximum voting age, coupled with lowering the voting age to 16 might seem radical, even controversial, but it's a bold step worth considering for the sake of societal progress and economic growth. This approach could ensure a more representative and future-oriented democracy, aligning the electoral system with the needs of younger generations who will shape and inhabit the future.

Now if you're over 65 and have read this far, you've likely already started huffing with disapproval and being offended. This is good news as it means you're engaged, have an opinion and are likely an active participant in the democratic process. That's brilliant.
But, if you think about it, you might also pick a number of your demographic not quite so politically or societally aware. You might even question whether some are aware full stop. Yet large numbers over 65 still make sure to cast their vote.What impact does that have in a societal context? 
Trouble is we can't have a subjective view of when someone is able to do a particular thing. That would be asking for trouble.
So as society we draw lines in the sand and age is typically one way of doing that. You can't get married until aged 16 etc. So, while you're probably still huffing around the idea of losing your abiliuty to vote, please hear me out.
You see firstly, younger voters are the engines of innovation. They are typically more in tune with rapid technological advancements and socio-economic shifts. By allowing the younger demographic more influence in the electoral process, we can foster a political environment that prioritises investment in technology, renewable energy, and education—all key drivers of economic growth.

The current system, often skewed towards older voters, can lead to policies that are more conservative and resistant to change, stifling innovation and slowing economic progress.

This demographic imbalance often leads to a right-wing skew in the electorate, as older voters tend to lean more conservatively. This conservative bias can hinder progressive policies that younger generations may support, such as expansive climate action, universal healthcare, and robust social safety nets. A maximum voting age, alongside a reduced minimum voting age, would promote society-focused voting, aligning policies with the needs of the most economically and socially active age groups. This change would ensure that the policy priorities are more in line with the broader society's concerns, including affordable housing and equitable job opportunities.

The imbalance is particularly concerning when considering privileged focussed policies such as increasing the state pension age, which disproportionately affects younger workers who may not yet have a voice in shaping these decisions. By redistributing electoral power, we ensure that policy-making reflects a balanced consideration of all age groups, driving policies that support sustainable growth and societal well-being.

The principle of a representative democracy is also at stake. Democracy thrives on the idea that the electorate should mirror the population it serves. However, with older citizens voting in disproportionately higher numbers, there is a risk that our leaders cater predominantly to their concerns, sidelining the younger generation's interests. A maximum voting age would help rectify this imbalance, ensuring that elected officials are truly representative of the entire population's demographics. This could lead to more dynamic and forward-looking governance, better prepared to tackle long-term challenges.

Most importsntly, and to the point of this missive, instituting both a maximum voting age and lowering the voting age to 16 could invigorate political participation among younger citizens. Knowing that their votes have a decisive impact, young people may feel more compelled to engage in the electoral process. This increased participation could lead to a more vibrant and responsive political system, fostering a government that is attuned to the future rather than stuck in the past.

While the concept of a maximum voting age and lowering the voting age to 16 is sure to provoke strong reactions, it is a necessary conversation for the future of democracy. By prioritizing the voices of those who will live longest with the consequences of today's decisions, we can build a more innovative, inclusive, and forward-thinking society. 

So no vote over 65! Is it time to embrace bold ideas for a future-ready democracy?